Friday, April 12, 2024

ARRL NTX ARES Team at Paris EOC

 Several members of the Red River Valley Amateur Radio Club
were spot lighted in the recent ARRL News Letter
(An Emailed Newsletter sent to those members which have signed up for same)
Steve KG5VK


ARRL Members may opt in or opt out of this Newsletter as well as news from their ARRL Division Director and Section manager.....

Free of charge to ARRL members...

  • Subscribe to the ARES Letter (monthly public service and emergency communications news), the ARRL Contest Update (biweekly contest newsletter), Division and Section news alerts, and much more!
The ARRL Letter is published Thursdays, 51 times each year. ARRL members may subscribe at no cost or unsubscribe by editing their Member Data Page at www.arrl.org/opt-in-out.

Wednesday, February 28, 2024

CEO Briefing to ARRL SM's analysis by Dick Norton

Dick Norton
Shares Comments on The ARRL CEO’s dialogue with ARRL Section Managers
during their February 2024 Team’s Meeting

 

The February 2024 ARRL Section Managers Electronic Meeting was primarily a lecture by Mr. Minster. I found a great deal of what Mr. Minster presented to conflict with facts or to omit relevant information.

 

My comments on some of the subjects presented follow. 

1) Introduction

 

Mr. Minster used the word "transparency" in his introductory remarks, claiming that he will give a "straight answer" to any question. However, he then stated that members do not have all the information that he does, and if you disagree with any of his answers, you need to "buckle up," which apparently means change your thinking to match his.

However, the ARRL Organizational Structure states, "The ARRL is a representative democracy. Its members control its policies through the power of the ballot." 

If the members control the policies, the members are entitled to information on potential changes to policies as well as reports on impact of policies and changes made to them.

2) Notice to Members About Potential By-Law 46 Changes

Mr. Minster said that it was not the practice to release potential Articles-of-Association and By-Laws motions to members. However, after the 2018 attempt to enact questionable bylaw changes, the Board, as articulated by President Roderick, promised to do exactly that. Despite that commitment, Mr. Minster complained about a couple of Board members following through on that promise by releasing a proposal to substantially expand By-Law 46 beyond its original purpose.

The notice prompted a group of prominent ARRL members to send postal-mail alerts to donors about the implications of the proposed changes. Mr. Minster claimed the letters had essentially no effect, something that conflicted with communications I received from multiple donors who were even reconsidering future gifts to the League. 

 

Those letters and other communication among members led to the proposed motion not being presented at the Board meeting, although it may well resurface in a slightly different form at a future meeting.


3) High-functioning ARRL Board

Mr. Minster claimed that the January Board meeting was great, and that we now have a high-functioning Board. This may be a result of the "Shadow Board" of 10 or 11 Directors who meet secretly with Mr. Minster on the Internet, forming League policy without the participation of all the Directors. His characterization may be appropriate to him if he confers only with those who agree with him.

4) By-Law 46

Misdirection is a technique used by magicians to divert the audience's attention away from what is actually causing an outcome. Misdirection was used in the defense of the proposed changes to By-Law 46.

Mr. Minster directed attention to a part of the proposed changes that purportedly just combined a number of relevant items into one single document, something that no one would likely find objectionable. He did not talk about three things that people have criticized:

a) allowing a majority of the Board to effectively vote minority or dissenting Board members off the Board, something that conflicts with Connecticut law.

b) requiring that Board members and potential Board members sign what amounts to a loyalty oath.

c) requiring Board members to publicly promote political ideas of the majority, rather than act in accordance with their beliefs of what best serves the organization, as required by Connecticut law.

 

Mr. Minster claimed that the proposed changes to By-Law 46 were not another attempt by a majority faction of the Board to concoct a mechanism to vote another member off the Board, but the details of the motion do not support that contention.

5) Ultra Vires Report

Mr. Minster made reference to an analysis of proposed By-Law 46 changes by an attorney in Massachusetts, who said the proposed changes went beyond the authority the Board actually had in that area.

a) Although Mr. Minster stated that he did not read the attorney's analysis, he nevertheless said that he initiated action by the League's Connecticut counsel, claiming that counsel had met with someone in the Connecticut Attorney General's office on the matter. He represented that that the Attorney General's office rejected the ultra vires analysis, although he has produced no written legal opinion from either the Attorney General or Connecticut counsel to support that representation.

b) Mr. Minster had not previously mentioned this legal engagement to either the Board or even the Administration and Finance Committee, nor had he advised them as to the legal fees involved, which could easily have run into tens of thousands of dollars.

6) Life Membership Costs

Mr. Minster made a few cursory comments on Life Membership costs. He stated that, in 1973, it was already clear that Life Membership was a bad idea, a conclusion not supported by facts and certainly in opposition to my evaluation.

In his discussions, Mr. Minster showed that he did not understand the roles of management, the Board, and the auditors in determining how much money can be recognized as revenue to cover the yearly costs of sustaining a Life Member. The assertion that you "can't take more (money) out" is not correct.

For 50 years, the League has run the Life Member program very satisfactorily, and in all years the related revenue recognition, which is based on management’s estimate of servicing costs combined with actuarial analysis, has been unconditionally approved by auditors. There have never been any contrary comments on this in any of the Annual Reports.

7) Internal vs. External Financial Reporting

For budgeting and internal reporting purposes, ARRL reports revenues and expenses without income from bequests (understandable because they are less predictable and cannot be managed) or unrealized changes in the market value of the League's investments (which fluctuate with short-term market conditions). External reporting, such as in the published annual report and in IRS filings, includes these components. Clams that the League lost money in a certain year may be based on the less complete internal reporting. A truer measure of financial condition can be gained by looking at Unrestricted Net Assets. ARRL’s unrestricted net asset balance grew over eleven of the past twelve years from roughly $6 million to over $20 million. The decline in 2022 was due to a decline in the market value of the investment portfolio with general market conditions, which was most likely temporary and should largely reverse during 2023 and 2024 as the markets recover.

Mr. Minster's claims of a dire financial situation do not appear well founded.

8) Roll Call Votes

Mr. Minster defended the July 2023 motion that eliminated the ability of a single Board member to call for a roll call vote and raised the threshold to now requiring five members.  This change raises questions in the minds of members as to why their representatives’ votes are not all recorded and available in the meeting minutes. He referred to some roll call votes being “weaponized.” Why should a Director fear the electorate seeing his or her vote on a matter? How a Board member votes on motions best describes the Board member's performance in directing League affairs.

9) Director's Workbook Being Made Public

Mr. Minster reported that the Board passed a motion that the Director's Workbook would be made public and that this would happen before Dayton. The Workbook is presently on the arrl.org website and could have been made public the day after the Board meeting. Is there something wrong with it that requires rewriting before the public can see it?

10) Print QST Costs, Dues Increase and Projected Member Loss

 

Mr. Minster defended the Board's actions in not living up to providing print QST to term members. I have not encountered a single member who agrees with this action in my participation in club meetings or forums. Membership forms that I accepted at conventions specifically stated postal delivery of print QST.

About 30 years ago, the League commissioned a study which concluded that the League would maximize its finances by roughly doubling the membership dues. The increase from the remaining members would offset that money lost from those who left. The Board at that time wisely chose not to go that way. They valued a larger membership over a larger treasury. I believe that choice should still prevail. Mr. Minster said that with every dues increase, the ARRL loses 6 to 9% of its membership, but that it returns after 3 years. This is simply not true. When the $39 to $49 increase took place, the League had been adding several thousand members per year. That series of increases abruptly stopped, and the membership has since shrunk from 170K to 150K. The membership has not rebounded.

11) Cost Cutting

Mr. Minster stated that at some point early in his present role, he determined that the League did not have a spending problem, but had a revenue problem instead. 

There has never been any evidence of this presented to either the Board or the A&F Committee.

There are many areas where costs could and should be better controlled. In one six-figure example, management replaced top-tier volunteer (free) trademark legal services with paid services running tens of thousands of dollars and additionally wasted over $50,000 in trademark extension fees by not providing trademark counsel with timely responses to repeated, documented requests.

 

12) Minster Salary

In a textbook example of a "Straw Man" response to an issue of his salary, Mr. Minster pointed out that an estimate that someone apparently made that it was $891K per year was not true. He also correctly pointed out that he did not give himself a $100K per year raise in April 2023.

He never did disclose that his salary is actually about $350K per year, up more than 40% over what he agreed to work for three years ago, but did claim that even with the new higher salary, he was the only underpaid person on the staff.

 

Mr. Minster is actually overpaid, and should be making about one half of his present $350K. If you want to verify this, put "Median salary for non-profit membership organization CEO in the Hartford, CT area" into any search engine such as Google or Bing. Ignore very high salaries from large non-profit medical or hospital groups with thousands of employees, since they are not related to a hobbyist organization with 75 employees.

One reference from salary.com shows: "The average Nonprofit Executive Director salary in Hartford, CT is $139,213 as of January 26, 2024, but the salary range typically falls between $116,573 and $168,847." 

 

Also note that none of these estimates consider that many League employees have worked for substantially less money than they might otherwise receive because of their love of Amateur Radio and their desire to serve it.

13) Employee Morale and Satisfaction

In response to a comment about employee morale, Mr. Minster related a comment from a Director who reported hearing a staff member describe the ARRL like being in North Korea. Mr. Minster countered with his claim that another long-time employee who had recently retired stated that the last two years there had been the best two years of the employee's career. 


The reports I've received as a Director unquestionably match the North Korea report best. I note that Mr. Minster is on his seventh administrative-assistant/secretary in three and a half years.

Since the ARRL Board's Standing (or permanent, not temporary) Committees now meet in the Marriott Hotel's meeting rooms rather than at ARRL headquarters, not only have our costs increased by several thousand dollars but Board members no longer have their long-standing opportunity to interact with staff members.


14) Logbook of the World (LOTW) and IT Manager

Mr. Minster stated that LOTW needs to be completely redesigned and rewritten from scratch, a conclusion actually not shared by LOTW experts.

The reason he gave that a new LOTW project manager has not been hired is that such a project manager would report to an IT manager, and the IT manager position needs to be filled first.

Mr. Minster has not been able to hire and retain an IT manager position in the three and a half years he has been on the job. He did hire a competent IT Manager once, but that person left after a few months, citing Mr. Minster as the reason for leaving.


Note that the person most respected as being the LOTW expert is retired software executive Dave Bernstein, AA6YQ. Dave would be the clear choice for someone to lead development of a future version of LOTW, and would probably do it without charge. Unfortunately, Dave is one of a number of volunteers with whom Mr. Minster is having a personal feud and is extremely unlikely to assist the League while it is under control of Mr. Minster.

15) Concluding Sermon

Mr. Minster ended his presentation with what might be called a threatening sermon.

He described people who disagreed with him as being ignoramuses.

He demanded that all SMs and volunteers talk positively about the ARRL, which seems to mean talk positively about how Mr. Minster is running it today. Those who wish the ARRL would operate in some different way that benefits Amateur Radio are not welcome. If you don't support Mr. Minster, you don't belong, and you should resign.

Some of you might now better understand what it must be like to work under Mr. Minster. Both volunteers such as Section Managers and paid employees should be treated with respect by management.

He lauded himself for the way he will be working at Dayton and expects volunteers to do the same. I suspect that if any volunteer Section Manager receives $350K per year, the SM will be happy to do so.

16) Conclusion

I found much of Mr. Minster's presentation to be inaccurate and/or inappropriate.

I welcome your comments on the Section Manager meeting.


73,

 

Dick Norton, N6AA

 


Thursday, March 31, 2022

ARRL North Texas Mentor Fest is this Saturday April 2nd, 2022 This is a FREE event


Please join us a reward our Presenters with your attendance
I will be Providing One door prize at each presentation as well as
Numerous Prizes given out during the Great Pizza break
The New Dual Band Yaesu HT drawing for thos that RSVP'd
by the 28th of March will also be drawn

Steve KG5VK

Wednesday, December 08, 2021

How I use Stream Deck and Node-Red tools at my Station KG5VK

Stream Deck and Node-Red tools at KG5VK


 A buddy of mine (K8KI) recently said 

"He had heard of both tools but was unsure how he would benefit from their use"


I decided to document my answer here...


Stream Deck (Manufactured by Elgato)

I use the Stream Deck tool for two things:

  • Allow quick access to buttons which launch Aps
  • Allow use of Macros via other Software on my Desktop 
The first is the Aps, which I could easily navigate to on my Computer Desktop via mouse movements, but I find much easier with a one button click are pictured below on the Main Stream Deck profile I use


From Top left to Bottom right, I have the "Next Profile button, SDR, DAX, CAT, Tune etc.
SDR launched my FlexRadio SDR software, Dax and Cat are launchable if I have terminated them for some reason (They normally launch when Smart SDR is launched)
Tune allows quick access to Enable/Disable of the SDR Tune button versus movement of the mouse
TQSL simply launches that app versus mouse usage and the same with N1MM+, Antenna Genius Software, DxLabs, FRStack and Slice-Master are there for less mouse use as well.

The CQ Test button takes me to another profile set within within my Stream Deck
allowing use of buttons to send Voice keyer messages, The FlexRadio Power button keys the shut shutdown of my radio locally in the shack.
Pressing the Commander button allows me one button selection of tools within the DxLabs Commander control of my radio allowing one button selection of keys like A=B VFO, A/B VFO, etc. which would other wise require mouse movement and mouse clicks.

I find pressing a button or even two or three buttons easier 
than dragging a mouse and clicking several times
much easier especially under contest or working a needed DX entity much less stressful.

My Stream Deck is the smaller 15 key version, however keep in my 
we can have many different profiles for different page sets of keys and what they do for us
Some of my keys launch a new page profile, some of the keys simply launch an App versus dragging the Mouse, the key is you setup your Stream Deck for your needs.


Node-Red

First off what the heck is Node-Red......

Node-RED is a programming tool for wiring together hardware devices, APIs and online services in new and interesting ways.

It provides a browser-based editor that makes it easy to wire together flows using the wide range of nodes in the palette that can be deployed to its runtime in a single-click.

IOW it is a Browser based tool for building a Program to do something with Hardware or other software, without the requirement to get a degree in C# Computer programming or even have a basic understanding of C#


Want to learn more there is a fantastic Groups dot IO email reflector with lots of 
Flows (Scripts) on Node-Red for use in Ham Radio here is a link to it.....
https://groups.io/g/nodered-hamradio/messages


So how do I use Node-Red tools:

Mainly for both local and remote control of equipment with my Ham Radio shack


I mainly built this to use when I am on the road and want to use my station remotely and be able to select different antennas, rotate an antenna etc.
My display layout is a bit rough, but it works for me
You will note two exact columns of beam heading on the right side

The Left column is for my 40m beam and the right one is for my HF Log periodic

I do not have a Flow installed on my Raspberry Pi that holds my Node-Red software and Scripts
which would show the Radio's different meters, I do have two other Node Display pages, which are available by clicking on the ICON to the Top Left of My Callsign on the page shown.

They look like this....



The Top one controls relays to a Receive antenna , changing the direction it is favoring
The lower screen controls a board with eight different relays mounted to my Raspberry Pi
for other tools in the shack, such as selecting an entirely different Receive antenna.

There are more than a few different tutorials on YouTube of getting started with use of Node-Red
my recommendation is just jump in and play with it
Start with small sketches and build-up from there.
I am far from a programmer, having only learned a bit of basic programming in the 70's in high school with Basic and punch cards.

I barely know what C Sharp (C #) is  :)

Node-Red Flows are built using Sketches versus writing Scripts or Code


I will tell you building Stream Deck profiles is supper easy

Cheers!

Steve
KG5VK 








Saturday, November 06, 2021

Presentation of the Hiram Percy Maxim Memorial Award to ARRL North Texan

 The First North Texan

and the first Young lady in Texas

to receive the Hiram Percy Maxim Memorial

youth award. 

Ms. Katherine M. Forson KT5KMF, amateur radio Extra class Licensee, was presented the Hiram Percy Maxim Memorial Youth Award. The presentation was orchestrated by Sean Kelly W5SPK President of the Plano Amateur Radio Klub (PARK) at a gathering of fellow amateur radio operators and dignitaries on the 20th of September in Plano, Texas

(Seated Left-Right, John Robert Stratton N5AUS The ARRL West Gulf Division Director,
Steven Lott Smith KG5VK ARRL North Texas SM, and Deputy Mayor Maria Tu of  Plano, Texas)
 
                   

John Robert Stratton N5AUS ARRL West Gulf Division Director
Presents Katherine Forson KT5KMF the Hiram Percy Maxim Memorial plaque



Attendees included friends and family members of the award recipient, as well as officers and members of more than a few ARRL affiliated clubs from North Texas and the former ARRL North Texas Section Manager Jay Urish W5GM


The Check accompanying the award is presented by
West Gulf Division Director John Robert Stratton N5AUS and ARRL NTX SM Steven Lott Smith KG5VK, while the honorable Deputy Mayor Maria Tu of Plano, Texas looks on.
              
                    


While Katherine is the first ever North Texas amateur Radio op and the first YL in Texas to receive this prestigious award, she is far from a stranger to receiving awards and making milestones. Having received her first Amateur Radio license at the young age of 15, in 2018 she was the recipient of the First place award in the Plano, Texas District Science Fair and went on that same year to secure second place in the Dallas Texas Science and Engineering Fair.

In early 2019 while campaigning to become the ARRL North Texas Section Manager (SM), I was afforded the opportunity to see a Ms. Forson do a rehearsal presentation for her third science fair competition, I was so impressed I decided that if I became the new SM  I would waste little time asking her and her parents if she could be our Section Youth Coordinator.

In May of 2019, I appointed Ms. Forson KT5KMF as  the ARRL North Texas Section Youth Coordinator, She has of course excelled at her position being one our most active and engaged ARRLNTX Section Staff Members. It is a great honor to have come to know her and her parents. (Steve KG5VK)